What is JudgeX

How to Guide

STEP 1: Type in the ‘strange’ or ‘outside of normal’ action #1 by the Judge.

STEP 2: Repeat Step-1, but for a second ‘strange’ / ‘ignoring the Law’ ruling or action:

STEP 3: Write out the 3rd strange action.  Obviously, there needs to be a SERIES of ignoring-the-law-to-help-rich-briber ACTIONS.

STEP 4:  Make assumptions for each ‘run’ of JudgeX.   The assumptions are basically stating what level of ‘Benefit-of-the-Doubt’ that you want to give the Judge.   In the Warren Mosler bribe of Judge Luis Delgado; I gave the Judge IMMENSE Benefit-of-the-Doubt.  Because Delgado was so brazen in violating the written law SO MANY TIMES, the math still showed a definitive bribe was accepted.

STEP 5: Simple math to put a number to the Probability of ‘STEP 1 ACTION’, ‘STEP 2 ACTION’, etc.    This will be slightly different depending on the type of ACTION.  Simply put your arguments and assumptions on paper – the Judge can be given an opportunity to explain himself based upon your written assumptions.

  IMPORTANT: Only include independent actions, not a series of actions that could be considered one-thing.  Independent Actions such   as: Breaking an Egg, and Packing a Suitcase.  There is no causal relationship between breaking the egg and packing the suitcase,   therefore they are INDEPENDENT ACTIONS.

STEP 6: Multiply the probability of each independent action.  You may need to make “reasonable” assumptions here, and that is fine.  Be reasonable.  Give the Judge a big benefit-of-the-doubt on each Independent action.

P(HONESTY) = (1/20) * (1/5) * (1/8) * (I/50)….for example

STEP 7: Evaluate how many ‘Bribery-Driven decisions’ the Judge could possibly make in a given week.   If you want to give the Judge a large ‘Benefit of the Doubt’; you can make the assumption that he/she could make 1 such decision per day.   Given the complexity of the issues and how long Trials usually last (average is about 3 days); one per day is a reasonable assumption.   For a 50-week work-year, that is 250 decisions/year.

STEP 8:   CALCULATE:    The formula is [1 / P(HONESTY) ] / Number of Possible Decisions Per Year  = Number of Years Between Natural Occurances

STEP 9:  EVALUATE:   If the span of time between when the SERIES of these IMPROBABLE / ILLEGAL actions is a very-large number, then you can make a reasonable argument that the SERIES of actions by the Judge weren’t simply mistakes, but were rather CALCULATED CORRUPTION.

EXAMPLE FROM THIS HOW-TO GUIDE

P(HONESTY) = (1/20) * (1/5) * (1/8) * (I/50) = 0.000025  = 0.0025% probability that the series of decisions represent honest/random actions

***It is important to give reasonable probabilities to the actions.   Obviously, you wouldn’t be looking into JudgeX unless what you have observed is far off the reservation to begin with; but still it is important to be REASONABLE.   Your adversary will have an opportunity to poke holes in your assumptions.

NUMBER OF YEARS BETWEEN NATURAL (RANDOM) OCCURANCES SUCH AS WHAT THE JUDGE DID = (1 / 0.000025) / 250 = 160 YEARS

This is a large number of years, but not a long enough period of time to make the claim “The Judge Took a Bribe”.     It is a judgement call as to what span of time is enough to make a Clear and Convincing argument of Bribery.   Certainly a 10,000 year calculation appears to indicate bribery.

KEY POINT:   Identify and record as many INDEPENDENT “WTF” actions as you can.   The braver the Judge is in weilding his king-level power, the more likely it is you can prove he took a bribe.

Note: Click Mosler’s Logo to visit his website: